Back to Health Freedomemail: info@zeusinfoservice.com

WHO Report on Homeopathy was Suppressed 22/2/07

www.zeusinfoservice.com

Photo: Louise Mclean

 











 

 

 

 

 

 

It has come to my attention through doing a great deal of searches on the internet over the last month and from the articles below  

WHO Recognition for homoeopathy – (Forum) http://hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=3796

that the World Health Organisation's report on homeopathy 2005 was deliberately suppressed.  Had it not been through a couple of forums, a Skeptic website and Dr. Peter Fisher's report, I would not have realised the degree to which the WHO report was squashed and killed off from public view.  

In the forum discussion above, they can find no sign of the Homeopathy Report on the WHO website.  www.who.org

 

The Skeptics article, which revealed what had truly been going on, is here:-

Beware of quacks at the WHO:   Objecting to the WHO draft report on homeopathy  -

Skeptical Inquirer,  Sept-Oct, 2005  by Cees N.M. Renckens,  Tom Schoepen,  Willem Betz  (were these the Dutch & Belgian doctors who leaked the report that Dr. Peter Fisher is referring to below?)

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2843/is_5_29/ai_n15763205

 

The draft WHO Report clearly stated that homeopathy was the second leading choice of healthcare worldwide and that there was strong evidence that it worked.  (I think second leading healthcare choice speaks for itself  but this knowledge was to be actively and deliberately suppressed from the world).

 

Clearly the choice of 24th December -

 

WHO recognition for homeopathy - Newindpress

WHO recognition for homeopathy

Newindpress, India - Dec 24, 2005

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Deviating from the trend of rejecting homeopathy treatment and medicine as mere placebos, the World Health ...


as the date  that the New India Press published it, was chosen so that as few people as possible would notice it.  I remember being told about the article at the time and trying to get it up on the internet, whereupon it kept coming up and disappearing repeatedly, making me think even then it was being censored. 

 

Even now, after extensive searching, the only website which has the original article that was published in New India Press, is Wonders of Homeopathy and mine :-

WHO RECOGNITION FOR HOMEOPATHY 

December 25 2005

http://www.wondersofhomeopathy.com/HomeopathyWHORecognition.htm

http://www.zeusinfoservice.com/Reports/10-1-06.html

 

 

Other websites that mention the WHO Report:

WHO puts final stamp of approval on homeopathy (scroll down page) January 02, 2006

http://homeopathy-dubai.blogspot.com/2006_01_01_homeopathy-dubai_archive.html

WHO recognition for homeopathy 

http://www.doctorhelpme.com/news.htm

 

An advanced search on the WHO website for the report brings these links up but no sign of the Report  Click here

From what Dr. Peter Fisher says below it appears that the WHO report was leaked to the Lancet and that is why they set out to not only destroy homeopathy but also completely bury the draft WHO report.

26thAugust 2005, a day that will be forever etched in the minds of homeopathic practitioners, is the day the Lancet decided to ‘end homeopathy’, even writing an editorial under that title.  Press releases were sent out to every major newspaper in the world, which you can see listed at the end of an article I wrote http://www.zeusinfoservice.com/Articles/Revolutionary-Revival.html

 

According to Dr. Peter Fisher who heads the Royal Homeopathic Hospital in London, UK and is the Queen’s homeopathic physician:

 

"The same issue of The Lancet featured a leak of the World Health Organisation's (WHO) draft report on homeopathy. The WHO document was apparently leaked to The Lancet by Dutch and Belgian doctors hostile to homeopathy; their comments and the (hostile) comments of Prof. Edzard Ernst of the University of Exeter were published.  Dr Xiaorui Zhang, Traditional Medicine Coordinator of WHO, who is responsible for the report, was also interviewed, but declined to comment on a leaked, confidential draft. This leak came only 2 days after The Times of London published, as its front page lead, a remarkably similar story: a leak of the Smallwood Enquiry on The Role of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the NHS commissioned by The Prince of Wales' Foundation for Integrated Health. It is ironic that the editor of The Lancet, Dr Richard Horton, wrote to The Times accusing Prof. Ernst of having ‘broken every code of scientific behaviour’ for leaking the draft report of the Smallwood Enquiry (and incidentally describing complementary medicine as ‘a largely pernicious influence… preying on the fears and uncertainties of the sick’), while simultaneously doing the same to the WHO report in his own journal! http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1375230

 

THE LANCET TAKES A POLITICAL POSITION                                                     AGAINST HOMEOPATHY

ECHAMP PRESS RELEASE (excellent article)

http://www.vhan.nl/fabrikanten.htm

 

Homeopathy and The Lancet

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
Dr Xiaorui Zhang,. Traditional Medicine Coordinator of WHO, who is responsible ... dies in acute infections of the upper respiratory tract ... indi- ...
ecam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/3/1/145.pdf - Similar pages

 

Dr Xiaorui Zhang Search:  http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=Dr.+Xiaorui+Zhang&btnG=Search&meta=

 

Homoeopathy's benefit questioned

However, the Lancet also reports that a draft report on homoeopathy by the World Health Organization says the majority of peer-reviewed scientific papers published over the past 40 years have demonstrated that homeopathy is superior to placebo in placebo-controlled trials.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4183916.stm

 

WHO'S IN BED WITH THE DRUGS COMPANIES?

 

The World Health Organisation, the drugs company and the $10,000 funding offer February 16, 2007

Excerpt: "Unfortunately WHO cannot receive funds from the pharmaceutical industry," he wrote to Mary Baker of the EPDA in June 2006.

"Our legal office will reject the donation. WHO can only receive funds from government agencies, NGOs, foundations and scientific institutions or professional organisations. Therefore I suggest that this money should be given to EPDA and eventually EPDA can send the funds to WHO which will give an invoice (and acknowledge contribution) to EPDA, but not to GSK."

He added: "This is in line with what we have done so far with other contributions to the report which are all coming from other professional organisations."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,2014587,00.html

 

(the most vitriolic website against homeopathy)

What alternative health practitioners might not tell you

http://www.ebm-first.com/?cat=8


 Risky alternative? 20/2/07

(Recent article from the Guardian with good comments about homeopathy at the end)

However, homeopath Jo Redmond, director of the Health Works clinic in east London, says they are treating more young families and more black and Asian patients. "People
think it is only a white, middle-class domain, or only for people who have treatments themselves. We are seeing parents who are fed up with doctors and don't want endless prescriptions."  http://lifeandhealth.guardian.co.uk/health/story/0,,2017092,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=1

 

 

An ‘exceptional’ World Health Assembly 

 17 June 2006 (Prince Charles delivered a speech)

A keynote speech was given by Prince Charles of the UK, on the importance of integrated health, which includes an integrated approach to nutrition, medicine, agriculture, the environment and social policies.

http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/health.info/twninfohealth028.htm

 

 

European Council for Classical Homeopathy Good Reports: 

http://www.homeopathy-ecch.org/content/view/44/63/