Back to Articles

email: info@zeusinfoservice.com

Chapter 1

War ‘Games’ of the New World Order

What do the London bombings, 9-11, the anthrax attacks, Oklahoma bombing, and Hurricane Katrina all have in common? Simply put, they are all inside jobs. Each of these operations were orchestrated by the U.S. intelligence services in order to grant the U.S. government pretext for ratcheting up the war on terrorism, and/or invoking increasing war measures at home, i.e. the Patriot Act and Homeland Security. The CIA’s Frankenstein creation, al-Qaeda, was the entity to be implicated and framed in most of these scenarios. The CIA operative Tim Osmond posing as fanatical Islamic terrorist Osama bin Laden has loomed large in the American psyche, reared on fireside stories of the bogeyman, and the CIA has milked their monster for all he is worth. However, with Michael Moore and other researchers exposing the business ties between the bin Laden’s and the Bush’s in addition to exposes on the CIA creation al-Qaeda, the U.S. mafiocracy had to find a new scapegoat. The new perpetrator would leave no paper trail. It would be the perfect crime, granting the U.S. government plausible deniability. Who did they frame? Who did they set up in their most recent assault on the American people? Mother Nature. Hurricane Katrina was blamed for FEMA’s controlled demolition of the Lake Portchartrain levee. The conspiracy researchers would be stopped cold. No one would believe their claims that FEMA had pulled off another World Trade Center-style controlled demolition. Everyone would blame Mother Nature. She would take the rap this time. No one would believe the government did it. Until now that is. This chapter will present the case for government conspiracy to commit mass murder so succinctly that conspiracy theory skeptics will be silenced once and for all.

None of the official stories involving any of the scenarios named above stand up under rigorous examination. To show that this is the case, let us examine the lead role each of these events has played in Hollywood CIA, Inc. productions by going through the list retroactively. Let us begin with the July 7 London bombings. By showing the striking parallels between the London bombings and the 9-11 attacks, we can begin to see how the official story falls apart as the toilet paper the script was written on begins to unravel.

The first parallel to be drawn is the fact that the same M.O. was followed on both sides of the Atlantic in both operations. In keeping with the National Planning Scenarios drawn up by the governments of both countries, which we will examine later in this chapter, anti-terrorist war game exercises were actually being conducted on the very days the terrorist attacks were happening in real-time. In the case of the London bombings, for instance, a government-appointed consultancy firm was conducting anti-terrorist bombing exercises in London on July 7, the very day of the bombings. The firm is Visor Consultants, which promotes itself as a crisis management consultancy agency. Peter Power, the Managing Director, is a former Scotland Yard official, working at one time with the Anti Terrorist Branch. In a BBC Radio 5 interview, Mr. Power informed the host of this show that at the time anti-terrorist bombing exercises were taking place in London bombs were being planted simultaneously at precisely the same locations – all seven locations where bombs later exploded. Amazingly, according to Power, his firm was running a 1,000-man strong exercise involving the London Underground being bombed at the exact same locations and times actual bombing events were taking place. Powell’s words as recorded on the BBC 5 program could not be more chilling, the incident clearly leaving him as shaken as any bystander on the scene:

At half past nine this morning, we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

(London Underground Bombing ‘Exercises’ Took

Place at Same Time as Real Attack, July 13, 2005

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones, Prison Planet)

Skeptics might argue that this is an incredible risk to take, having terrorists planting bombs right under the noses of an antiterrorist bombing unit, but it actually grants the terrorists plausible deniability and cover. Should they be caught planting a bomb, they can say that they are merely involved in a mock terrorist bombing drill. In fact, they would never even be under suspicion because the drill participants would naturally make this deduction on their own. It not only grants the small compartmentalized government-sponsored terrorists the cover they need to carry out the operation, but the immunity required should they get caught during the attack or afterwards with the incriminating evidence. In addition, the London terror alert level was lowered in advance of the bombings, giving the perpetrators extra cover to plan and execute the attacks unimpeded by stringent security hurdles.

Precisely the same modus operandi was employed on the morning of September 11, 2001, when the CIA was conducting drills involving the flying of hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning. At least six National Planning Scenario-type drills were held in the days preceding the 9-11 attacks. NORAD had been briefed in advance that the CIA would be conducting these drills. This explains NORAD’s failure to respond when a total of 22 hijacked airliners showed up on their radar screens. The normal reactive procedure and protocols were ignored and the response consequently forestalled and delayed. (London Underground Bombing ‘Exercises’ Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack, July 13, 2005)

The next objection to be raised will of course be motive. Skeptics will argue that no government would be mad or maniacal enough to stage attacks on its own people for the sake of any agenda or policy pursuit. History tells us that this is just not so. The United States, the UK and other powers have been implicated in either staging or planning such events in the past, so why not now? Northwoods, a now often cited declassified document, was presented by the Joint Chiefs of Staff on behalf of the CIA to the president in 1963, and called for the shooting down of mock passenger airliners that were assets of the CIA and blaming it on Cuba to justify a military invasion of Cuba by the United States. The plan even called for fake passengers lists and mock funerals for the bereaved families of the non-existent dead. The plan was shelved, but seems to have found a new lease on life some 40 years after it was first proposed. Granted it has undergone a facelift and cosmetic surgery, but the basic M.O. remains intact. When similar scenarios have actually gone from boardroom to planning and implementation stage, why not 9-11 and the London bombings? Many researchers have studied Roosevelt’s failure to respond when advanced warning of an imminent attack on Pearl Harbor came to his attention. It is now well documented that the intelligence apparatus of the United States had broken the Japanese coded transmissions to their diplomatic missions abroad, which were issued through false weather reports and the American government was forewarned of an imminent attack days in advance. When the advanced warning on Pearl Harbor was ignored to grant the US government pretext and justification for entering an unpopular war, why would the same consideration not be in effect on 9-11 when a terrorist attack blamed on the Middle East opened up whole vistas of oil rich sand dunes falling into the oil barons of the American government who could convince an angry public that the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq was both righteous and justified?

Lack of motive is clearly not a convincing objection. There is plenty of motive and plenty to be gained by state-sponsored terrorists in the UK and USA. Prior to the London bombings, BBC polls showed that 80 percent were opposed to the ID cards. Support for the EU and increased globalization is sure to get the public nod again in the wake of the retreating terrorist tide. In addition, Blair and Bush were both facing indictments in a Federal Grand Jury trial being held in Chicago at the time of the bombings.

(Tony Blair's MI-6 Agents Caught Trying To Blow Up Chicago Subway: To Derail US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald's Grand Jury Investigations of Bush-Blair White House Leaks, by Tom Heneghan & Stew Webb Tom Heneghan & Stew Webb, www.stewwebb.com)
 
It appears that French Intelligence in collaboration with the U.S. Marshall Service caught four of Tony Blair's British MI-6 Agents trying to bomb the Chicago Subway system on the night of Monday July 18, 2005. The four were charged in Federal Court with explosives possession. Chicago US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald served Tony Blair a subpoena in the CIA Valerie Plame case on July 13, 2005 to answer questions regarding his role in the leaks connected to George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, Condeleeza Rice, Andrew Card, Scooter Libby and Karl Rove. Neither Tony Blair nor George W. Bush has yet responded to their subpoenas. Tony Blair had previously supplied George W. Bush with a false British Intelligence directive stating that Iraq leader Saddam Hussein had obtained “dirty bomb” nuclear materials from Niger. This false intelligence report provided Bush with pretext and justification to go to war in Iraq. The report has since been proven to be bogus, rendering the entire war a crime against humanity and its perpetrators war criminals and treasonous thugs guilty of misleading and betraying their own citizens. Valerie Plame's husband, Ambassador Joseph Wilson, submitted his report prior to the Bush-Blair lies that Niger never sold nuclear materials to Iraq. Wilson later alleged Bush lied in his State of the Union address to the nation. Valerie Plame's CIA Network was further investigating Bush and Cheney for planning the 9-11 attacks. New York Police Bernard Kerik it is claimed, who ran a FEMA operation out of pier 29 known as Code Angel also known as Tripod II, planted bombs in the 7 World Trade Center Building that was demolished on September 11, 2001. This operation was a US Justice Department operation involving Gary Best of the Defense Intelligence Agency, a George H. W. Bush shadow government operative. Arrested in French New Guinea for spying, Best has confessed to 9-11 involvement. Bush and Blair were obviously attempting to derail the Federal Grand Jury investigations of their violations of National Security Laws and their illegal invasion of Iraq through the issuance of intentionally falsified reports. Their further treason attacks on America involve rogue CIA, DIA, British MI-6, Russian and MOSSAD agents who were also involved in the 9-11-2001 World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks.
 
(Tony Blair's MI-6 Agents Caught Trying To Blow Up Chicago Subway: To Derail US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald's Grand Jury Investigations of Bush-Blair White House Leaks, by Tom Heneghan & Stew Webb Tom Heneghan & Stew Webb, www.stewwebb.com)

However, despite having being exposed for racketeering, war crimes, and other treasonous offenses, Blair and Bush will continue to hold office for quite some time. Meanwhile, a frightened public fearful of bombing attacks by international terrorists will now rally behind their unpopular, largely discredited, and vilified leaders, who will declare open season on terrorists again, giving the fledgling war on terrorism the required booster shot it needs.

Another parallel between the July 7 London bombings and 9-11 is the fact that, just as the Bush administration had received advanced warnings of imminent terrorist attacks involving hijacked airliners from German and Russian intelligence agencies and from operatives within its own intelligence apparatuses, so Tony Blair had been repeatedly warned by Israeli of an imminent terrorist threat from July 4 but chose to ignore the warning. Reports by the Associated Press and the intelligence specialists Stratfor were the two main sources for this leak. The AP reports were then quickly withdrawn from public view, but have been salvaged and can be seen at www.nomorefakenews.com and numerous other websites. Another major oversight of Blair’s intelligence minions is the fact that the MI5 made a number of glaring errors in their presentation of the “al-Qaeda” website, even revealing a DNS trace to a server within the United States. What this proves beyond doubt is that “al-Qaeda” was being framed by MI5 for the London attacks. And since “al-Qaeda” were being framed by the British intelligence, this implies that the perpetrators were framing another organization for their own crime, proving inside complicity beyond doubt. Whether al-Qaeda, the CIA or MI5 were actually involved in the London bombings is really irrelevant since they are all in cahoots with one another. Haroon Rashid Aswat, the man identified by British Police as being the mastermind of the London bombings, was working for MI6, it has been revealed by leading U.S. and French intelligence assets, which is an illustrative enough example of the duplicity, double-dealing, roguery, and deception of the “double agent”. (“Haroon Aswat…FBI agent threatens former USDA federal agent, now staff reporter for The New Criminologist,” Berry-dee, Christopher, Sept. 25, 2005)

John Loftus, a terrorism expert and a former prosecutor for the US Justice Department, has revealed that the so-called mastermind of the July 7^th bombings, Haroon Rashid Aswat, is actually a British intelligence asset. Loftus revealed that the so-called Al-Muhajiroun group, based in London had formed during the Kosovo crisis, when fundamentalist Muslim leaders were recruited by MI6 to fight in Kosovo, as he explains, “Believe it or not, British intelligence actually hired some Al-Qaeda guys to help the Muslim rights in Albania and in Kosovo. That’s when Al-Muhajiroun got started.” Loftus then launches into a blistering attack on MI6 and the US Department of Justice, which he claims protected this asset:

Back in 1999 he came to America. The Justice Department wanted to indict him in Seattle because him and his buddy were trying to set up a terrorist training school in Oregon…we’ve just learned that the headquarters of the US Justice Department ordered the Seattle prosecutors not to touch Aswat…apparently Aswat was working for British intelligence.

(Christopher Berry-Dee, “London Bombing ringleader, Haroon Rashid Aswat – double agent for MI6,” New Criminologist, August 23. 2005)

The story when previously aired was given a spin, making it appear like a slight ‘difference of opinion’ between the FBI and MI6, with the British Home Office portrayed as being reluctant to hand Aswat over to US authorities because of his British citizenship. US intelligence officials, on the other hand, are said to be furious because every time they have got close to getting their man, he has slipped through the cracks.

In a vitriolic attack, Loftus claims the al-Qaeda exists as an organized unit only where the intelligence agencies have created, funded and backed its operations. Loftus argues that several weeks before the London Bombings, Aswat was again located by a South African intelligence agency, but allowed to slip through the net again, this time to London:

He was a British intelligence plant. So all of a sudden he disappears. He’s in South Africa. We think he’s dead; we don’t know he’s down there. Last month the South African Secret Service come across the guy. He’s alive…the Brits know that the CIA wants to get a hold of Haroon. So what happens? He takes off again, goes right to London. He isn’t arrested when he lands. He isn’t arrested when he leaves…He’s on the watch list. The only reason he could get away with that was if he was working for British intelligence. He was a wanted man. (Ibid)

This game is typical of the Illuminati-Freemason fronts known as the world’s intelligence agencies. Keep in mind that the intelligence agencies of Europe were founded by Freemasons and Rosicrucians Francis and Roger Bacon back in Elizabethan times. The Masons have always funded and supported both sides in any kind of regional or international war. It is their modus operandi and was practiced by the elite Templar family the House of Guise and Lorraine, whose family coat of arms was the “double cross,” more Freemason jargon that has entered the English language, signifying betrayal, something this crime society is highly skilled in.

Aswat has been protected by British intelligence because he is a typical double agent. Double agents are part of the whole scheme of “double crossing”. They work for both sides because the intelligence services that employ them work for both sides. They are playing dialectics – thesis-antithesis-synthesis – as part of their game plan. By manipulating both sides, they can direct their agenda toward a high, overarching goal based on the founding of a New World Order. Loftus sums up the game plan nicely:

This is the guy (Aswat), and what’s really embarrassing is that the entire British police are out chasing him, and one wing of the british government, MI6 or the British Secret Service, has been hiding him. And this has been a real source of contention between the CIA, the Justice Department, and Britain…he is a double agent. (Ibid)

This is very reminiscent of the operation involving the OSS to train Bronstein, codename Trotsky, and his cohorts in the United States to foment the Bolshevik Revolution back in Russia. Trotsky was detained in Halifax, Nova Scotia by Canadian immigration police, but in a move similar to the one we are now witnessing with Aswat, British intelligence intervened, pulled rank on the Canadian immigration authorities and told the to let Trotsky (Bronstein) go. (Maclean, “How Canada Lost Its Chance to Shorten the War: Why Did Canada let Trotsky Go?”)

Noam Chomsky and other researchers of the more diligent stripe have already exposed the fact that the CIA, MI5 and MI6 had financed al-Qaeda as a terrorist cell that would pose a serious security threat to the Soviets in the Cold War era. It was at this time that Osama bin Laden was and probably still is on the CIA payroll operating under the code name “Tim Osmon”. (“Tony Blair Ordered the London Bombings”, Commentary by Michael James, www.rense.com) Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally "the database", was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians. (Former Blair Minister Points Out Al-Qaeda CIA Ties, Robin Cook, London Guardian, July 09, 2005)

Soon after the July 7 London bombings, Blair notified the press that the bombings bore the profile of an al-Qaeda attack. This is true of course and he would be the first to know. The patsy al-Qaeda terrorist network is the changeling bastard child of the British intelligence services and CIA, along with the Freemason-controlled terrorist school known as the Muslim Brotherhood. The attacks were ordered and managed by the British intelligence network probably under the direct supervision of Tony Blair, who most likely ordered the attacks, or at least gave the order under a chain of command at the level of national leader. (Tony Blair Ordered the London Bombings, Commentary by Michael James, www.rense.com)

In order to give the reader some background here, it is necessary to give some history on the Muslim Brotherhood. It emerged out of Egypt in 1928 and evolved into “the largest and most influential Sunni revivalist organization in the 20^th century.” Founded by Hasan al-Banna, founder of an organization called Society for Moral Behavior, it was cultivated in an atmosphere of reverent fundamentalism. He later spawned another group called Society for Impeding the forbidden. At age 16, he enrolled in an Islamic school in Cairo in order to train to become a teacher. He was steeped in Sufi literature and organized a Sufi society called the Hasafiyya Society for Welfare. The other major influence in Hasan al-Banna’s life was Freemasonry. He became a member of the Masonic Brotherhood at a young age, an absolutely normal route for someone in high Egyptian society to take.

The Muslim Brotherhood received a lot of backing and support from British intelligence and British Freemasonry, which amounts to the same thing since British intelligence emerged out of Freemasonry under Sir Francis and Roger Bacon in Elizabethan England. It was sponsored by the great names in British Middle East intelligence. It had links to British intelligence through dame Freya Stark prior to World War II and the Shah of Iran’s regime even considered it to be a tool of British Freemasonry, rightfully so. The explosion of violence throughout the Middle East in the late 70’s and 80’s, referred to by Zbigniew Brzezinski as the “Arc of Crisis”, was not a chance event, but the result of meticulous planning by Global strategists such as Dr. Alexander King, Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and British Operative and Oxford man, Bernard Lewis. The author of this book was not even aware of Lewis’s intelligence credentials when he consulted several of Lewis’s books in writing another chapter due to his reputation as an expert in Middle East studies.

The Muslim Brotherhood was focused specifically on Islam. It was Freemasonry for Muslim initiates only. While Freemasonry was liberal and allowed members of all faiths to join, the Muslim Brotherhood was exclusively Islamic. Like masonry, the Muslim Brotherhood invoked great secrecy and was run according to a pyramidal command structure. The infantry at the bottom had no idea of the plans being orchestrated by the generals at the top.

Above all, the Muslim Brother is loaded controlling tens of millions of readily available liquid assets, while controlling billions more in daily business deals involving everything from oil transactions and banking to drug-trafficking, illegal arms merchandising to gold and diamond smuggling. The Anglo-American Freemason-controlled intelligence apparatus has heavy investments in a mercenary terrorists-for-hire racket. They are partners in a powerful worldwide financial empire whose vast wealth is hidden in numbers Swiss bank accounts and offshore tax havens in Dubai, Kuwait, and Hang Kong.

And this is where Osama bin Laden comes in. It was in the 1970’s that Osama would have his first exposure to the Muslim Brotherhood. Prior to this in the 1960’s, Mohammed Qutb, brother of Sayed Qutb, the Muslim Brotherhood’s chief ideologue, emigrated to Saudi Arabia as a result of Nassar’s crackdown on the organization. In the 60’s, he was given several positions in Saudi universities to promulgate the mission of the Muslim Brotherhood and gain recruits. While in Saudi Arabia, he conceived of an organization called the World Assembly of Muslim Youth, which became a reality in 1972 thanks to generous donations from the bin Laden family. Osama’s brother Omar was a director at one time and his brother Abdullah also served as a director. Abdullah and WAMY were actually being investigated by the FBI in the lead up to 9-11 till their investigation was abruptly halted by the Bush administration at the beginning of 2001. (“The British, Muslim Terrorism and September 11, Part Two: The Muslim Brotherhood: The Globalist’s Secret Weapon,” http://www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/MB.htm)

The terrorist attacks are state-sponsored. They are staged events, nothing more. Osama bin Laden is an insider, a CIA operative with a carefully cultivated “deep cover” pedigree. He is the most convenient scapegoat in the traditional Freemason game of playing both sides. Hegelian dialectics is what it is called and no one plays the game better than the Masons and the Intelligence organizations and terrorist rackets they control. The London bombings and 9-11 were staged events. It’s not by accident that the planes going into the twin towers looked like a scene from Die Hard II. It was staged. And it is entirely likely that the CIA’s own Hollywood insiders were consulted to give the operation the right ‘look’. It was what top officials and globalist planners call a National Planning Scenario staged to take place in real time and Osama and al-Qaeda were implicated to take the blame for it in advance and by design.

The fact is that war game drills similar to those staged on 7-7 and 9-11, known to insiders as National Planning Scenarios, are regularly staged in the USA, Canada, and the UK code-named Operation Top-off. As reported in the media, a mock terrorist drill was taking place at the same time the terrorist attacks were actually happening in real-time. National Planning Scenarios of this kind are now being held in several major cities around the world. (Planning the Next Pandemic, “Staging the Operation”, la.indymedia.org) The author actually witnessed one of these operations in Seoul at Seoul Railway Station on September 6, 2005, and became alarmed when it dawned on him that an actual attack could be on the way in Seoul in light of recent events.

Investigators have revealed that an Operation Top Off-style war game exercise was being conducted Stateside during the week leading up to and on the actual day of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. This presupposes an inside job on both sides of the Atlantic because two war game exercises were being conducted on both sides of the Atlantic on precisely the same day that an actual terrorist attack was being launched, a timeframe parallel to striking to be dismissed as coincidence. Of course someone might pose the objection that the terrorists might have staged the event on the day a National Planning Scenario was being planned as part of a decoy operation to insulate themselves from detection. But this begs the question, ‘How would they know?’ The date of these operations is classified information. Prior knowledge presupposes inside knowledge, which presupposes a state-sponsored inside job and culpability. A terrorist event staged on the same day a mock terrorist drill is taking place by government-appointed teams points to a government-led conspiracy to commit mass murder. The fact that such striking coincidences should have occurred on both sides of the Atlantic in countries known to have such close ties that they have seen each other through war after war does rather implicate the highest ranking government officials of both nations in high treason. Indeed, when all is said and done, it is not just the twin towers of the WTC that will have come tumbling down, but the heads that will role in Westminster and Capitol Hill when the full extent of their treasonous activities is brought to light.

(“Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job'”
By Greg Szymanski
June 12, 2005

Is there any evidence the official story is coming apart at the seams? Morgan Reynolds, a highly recognized former chief economist in the Labor Department, has come forward to express doubts about the official 9/11 story. He cites evidence of cover up and other suspicious circumstances that call the official story into question. He calls the official story about the collapse of the WTC 'bogus,' arguing that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. "If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling," Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D. is quoted as saying.

Reynolds, now a professor emeritus at Texas A&M University, also calls it 'next to impossible' that 19 Arab Terrorists could have led the mighty U.S. military a cat and mouse game. A scientific report on the WTC collapse might bring down the edifice of lies as hastily as a controlled demolition may have done the twin towers themselves, and Reynolds is calling for just such an investigation. "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7," Reynolds argues. (Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job' By Greg Szymanski) If anything, it was not the twin towers that stood on shaky ground nor were they in the least vulnerable to attack by commercial airliners and burning jet fuel. It is the government’s edifice of lies that appears to be vulnerable and with a steady army of researchers slowly demolishing the official 9-11 story, it is unlikely the edifice of lies will stand for long. The investigative media are going to bring the government-orchestrated tower of lies down in the same spirit as the controlled demolition they themselves orchestrated. And was there ever a more poetic justice in the history of the world? Indeed, the Divine Architect could not have planned a scheme for retribution and setting things to rights better. Reynolds sums up the flimsy nature of the government’s tower of lies effectively by stating:

If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings.

He then adds even more ominously and strikingly:

More importantly, momentous political and social consequences would follow if impartial observers concluded that professionals imploded the WTC. Meanwhile, the job of scientists, engineers and impartial researchers everywhere is to get the scientific and engineering analysis of 9/11 right.

(Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job'
By Greg Szymanski)

Reynolds acknowledges, however, that the job of “getting it right in today's security state” is formidable given that government-orchestrated obstruction of justice is at play, in which explosives and structural experts have been intimidated in their analyses of the collapses of the World Trade Center Twin Towers. While the government line on the collapse of the towers is that burning jet fuel brought them down, many independent investigators have expressed strong disagreement. They have been hard pressed to come up with hard evidence to disprove the government line, however, since FEMA had already removed most of the hard evidence prior to independent investigation. (Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job' By Greg Szymanski)

It is interesting to note that the company in charge of FEMA’s hard evidence removal operation was a firm aptly named Controlled Demolition. If there was ever an example of irony in a dramatic plot that exposed the true perpetrators it is this. Indeed, the WTC was brought down by a “controlled demolition”, and the government agents involved in the clean-up operation were probably the very agents who had planted the incendiary devices that brought down the towers in the first place. Controlled Demolition has certainly been given a clean bill of health by the U.S. government, which has awarded it with federal contracts worth billions. But, why in God’s name is the company so highly trusted when its track record shows it to be a corrupt entity? Could it be because there is honor among thieves? Who else would a criminal government involved in racketeering, fraud and mass murder hire but another mafia family to cart away the evidence? Who else could you trust but a family – the Loizeaux family headed by Mark Loizeaux of Baltimore – whose own backs are against the wall for having faced a Federal Grand Jury for falsely reporting campaign contributions for Elijah E. Cummings, a Democrat Representative for the state of Maryland? The Baltimore Sun reported that the illegal contributions allegedly occurred between 1996 and 1998, but the Loizeaux’s and Controlled Demolition were acquitted in 2000. (David Icke, Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster, p.152) Should the company fail to carry out the government-ordered cover-up of 9-11 evidence to the letter, the case would be reopened with Mercurial speed and they would duly face indictment. Having been on hand to carry away the hard evidence in the state-sponsored terror on the Alfred P. Murrah Building of Oklahoma, the same family was on site once again to clean up the dirty mess left behind by another government-orchestrated terror event known as 9-11. They would then cart the hard evidence away to a facility safely under the guard of CIA subcontractor George Wackenhut, a man placed in charge of many important operations too delicate for the CIA. (David Icke, Alice and the WTC, p. 152-153)

Junkyard dog George Wackenhut would take charge of the wreckage. Why would the government allow Wackenhut to dispose of the hard evidence in the case? This is the man whose company has on its board former CIA, FBI and Pentagon Officials. Wackenut was also in charge of the operation to ensure that Saddam Hussein got the biochemical weapons material he needed. Wackenhut Corporation , a publicly traded company with strong CIA affiliations and federal contracts worth $200 million a year made sure Saddam received his materials intact. Wackenhut is in tighter than a steel vice with the government. When it comes to security matters, Wackenhut virtually is the government. In 1991, a third of the company’s $600 million revenues came from the government, while another substantial part was met by companies that are also under subcontract hire by the government like Westinghouse. Wackenhut is the largest single company providing security to U.S. embassies overseas. Many of the embassies in question have been in important hotbeds of espionage activity, such as Chile, Greece and El Salvador. It also guards most of the strategic government facilities in the U.S., including the Alaskan oil pipeline, the Hanford nuclear waste facility, the Savannah River plutonium plant, and the Strategic Petroleum reserve.

Wackenut has close ties with the U.S. government in other ways. Early board of directors included Captain Eddie Rickenbacker, Gen. Mark Clark, and Ralph E. Davis (a John Birch Society leader). Current and recent board members have included much of the country’s recent national security directorate, including, former FBI director Clarence Kelley; former Defense Secretary and former CIA deputy Frank Carlucci; former Defense Intelligence Agent director General Joseph Carroll; former U.S. Secret Service director James J. Rowley; former Marine commandant P.X. Kelley; and acting chair of President Bush’s foreign intelligence advisory board and former CIA deputy director Admiral Bobby Ray Inman; and before being appointed as Reagan’s CIA director, William Casey was Wackenhut’s outside legal counsel. The company is a mini army with some 30,000 armed personnel on its payroll. (“Inside the Shadow CIA” by John Connoly, Spy Magazine, Sept 1992 Vol 6)

Critics claim the Bush administration has engaged in overt obstruction of justice, an undeniable charge given their tampering with the investigations of the bin Laden family and WAMY (World Army of Muslim Youth) by the FBI prior to 9-11. As with the so-called independent Warren Commission investigating the JFK assassination headed by Freemason, CIA and military insiders all the way, the recent 9/11 Commission has failed to address the major evidence contradicting the official version of 9/11, a whitewash and cover up by the same breed of government-appointed insiders. Some deliberately overlooked flaws in the government jet fuel theory include:

1. Photos showing people walking around in the hole in the North Tower where 10,000 gallons of jet fuel was supposed to have been burning.

2. Most of the North Tower's fire had already died before the South Tower was hit, burning for only 16 minutes, making it relatively easy to contain and control without a total collapse.

3. The fire did not grow over time as was alleged and which would have been necessary for the government line to be credible, probably because it quickly ran out of fuel and was dying, indicating that without the edition explosive devices, the fires could have been easily controlled.

4. FDNY fire fighters still remain under a tight government gag order not to discuss the explosions they heard, experienced, and witnessed. A similar 9/11 gag order has been imposed on FAA personnel. This state-sponsored obstruction of justice makes it criminal for witnesses to make statements or give evidence in contradiction to the official story. Obstruction of justice in itself points to criminal conspiracy. Who is the government protecting, itself?

5. Even the whitewash known as the 9/11 Commission Report acknowledges that "none of the [fire] chiefs present believed that a total collapse of either tower was possible."

6. History shows that fire has never before caused steel-frame buildings to collapse except for the three WTC buildings, nor has fire been responsible for the collapse of any steel high rise since 9/11.

7. The fires, especially in the South Tower and WTC-7, were relatively small, and not the towering infernos reported by the government and mainstream media. WTC-7 was unharmed by any airplane and had only minor fires on the seventh and twelfth floors, yet it collapsed in less than 10 seconds.

8. WTC-5 and WTC-6 had raging fires but did not collapse despite much thinner steel beams.

9. It's difficult if not impossible for hydrocarbon fires like those fed by jet fuel (kerosene) to raise the temperature of steel – especially high-tempered steel – close to melting point.

(Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job' By Greg Szymanski)

Mainstream experts, speaking for the administration, pose the theory that an airplane impact weakened the structures, while intense fires resulted in thermally weakening, causing buckling failures, which allowed the upper floors to pancake onto the floors below. Thomas Eager, professor of materials engineering and engineering systems at MIT, supports the government line. He argues that the collapse occurred as a result of the extreme heat from the fires, causing the loss of loading-bearing capacity on the structural frame. Eagar points out the steel in the towers could have collapsed only if heated to the point where it "lost 80 percent of its strength," or around 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit. Critics claim his theory is flawed since the fires did not appear to be intense and widespread enough to reach such high temperatures. Intellectual prostitutes can be found under every rock. Historical precedent alone should discount this theory, since no fire, however intense, has ever resulted in the collapse of structural support for any high-rise building. Other proponents of the government position claim the impact of the airplanes, not the heat, weakened the entire structural support system of the towers, but critics contend the beams on floors 94-98 did not appear to have suffered any structural weakness, much less the entire building structure.

(Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job' By Greg Szymanski)

It is virtually impossible to prove or disprove either theory at this point due to the absence of hard evidence. Hard evidence to substantiate either theory is lacking due to FEMA's quick removal of the structural steel before it could be analyzed. Even though the criminal code requires that crime scene evidence remain unmolested for the sake of forensic analysis, FEMA had it destroyed or shipped overseas before a serious investigation could take place. This in itself proves beyond doubt that a government agency broke the law, a law forbidding the tampering or destruction of evidence in a criminal investigation. Given the magnitude of the crime of mass murder and a crime against humanity, the fact that FEMA tampered with and destroyed evidence implicates the government agency in tampering with evidence and a Grand Jury indictment of FEMA and Controlled Demolition should have commenced immediately, along with those in the government who ordered the removal and destruction of hard evidence before a proper investigation of the crime scene could be orchestrated. Besides FEMA's quick removal of the debris, authorities considered the steel quite valuable as New York City officials had every debris truck tracked on GPS and even fired one truck driver who took an unauthorized lunch break. And even more doubt is cast over why FEMA acted so swiftly since coincidentally officials had arrived the day before the 9/11 attacks at New York's Pier 29 to conduct a war game exercise, named "Tripod II." (Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job' by Greg Szymanski) This National Planning Scenario-style war game exercise would have granted the planters of any incendiary devices the cover they needed to get away with their crime. The fact that a bomb squad was seen on the scene of the Alfred F. Murrah building the morning of the Oklahoma bombing incident shows that a similar cover operation was going on six years earlier.

Glenn and Kathy Wilburn lost two children in the Oklahoma bombing. They conducted and documented more than 300 hours of interviews. The level of corroboration achieved in these interviews substantiates beyond a reasonable doubt the fact that a heavily armed bomb squad had been in downtown Oklahoma near the Murrah Building the morning of the bombing. Among those who have testified to having seen them are Oklahoma lawyer Daniel J. Adomitis, who stated:

There was this fairly large truck with a trailer behind it. It had a shield on the side of the door that said ‘bomb disposal’ or ‘bomb squad’ below it. And I really found that interesting. You know, I’d never seen anything like that in person. (David Icke, Alice and the WTC Disaster , p.154)

Some parents saw people in bomb squad gear as they dropped their children off at the day care center at the Murrah Building. Eventually, the Sheriff’s Department had to cave into pressure and acknowledge that the bomb squad had been there. In the end, other families became convinced that the authorities had prior knowledge of an imminent attack and failed to act as in 9-11. The Wilburns and other families filed suit against the US government alleging prior knowledge and failure to respond, and also cited the fact that ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms and Tobacco) agents had been “alerted not to go to work on April 19th, 1995.” (David Icke, p.154)

In a M.O. that is becoming all too familiar, it appears likely that a fire drill or bomb scare exercise was staged only days before the bombing of the Murrah Building on April 12, 1995, when approximately 300 people were evacuated from the building for unknown reasons. Mr. Wilburn related the contents of a conversation between a gentleman who was frantically searching for his wife and an ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms) official following the explosion that is most revealing:

And the first thing the gentleman did, the husband of the woman who was in the building, the first person he ran into was an agent of the ATF down on the street. And he asked him…what was happening, and the quote from the agent was ‘It was either a natural gas explosion or it was a bomb. We had a bomb threat yesterday, and some of us were called and were told that we didn’t have to come in if we didn’t want to.’

(Jim Keith, OKBomb: Conspiracy and Cover-up, p.68-69)

This suggests far more than prior knowledge. It suggests that bomb scare exercises were conducted in advance of the bombing to waylay and prevent federal employees from showing up that day. It also suggests probable practice exercises to get the state-sponsored terrorists operating within the front of the ATF out of the building after planting the incendiary devices the day of the bombing. This last theory is a radical one calling for support. Fortunately, there is evidence that these drills were preparatory for a real-day event.

Two witnesses came forward claiming to have seen a black helicopter hovering above the Murrah Building, “…for some time prior to the explosions, only to fly away before the explosions took place, and not return.” NORAD would neither confirm nor deny the allegations of these witnesses. One member of a Red Cross team named Frank, who made statements on a call-in radio program, claimed to have witnessed more than one black helicopter at the scene, contending, “…we had two black helicopters flying about the building, fifteen minutes before the explosion, loading people up to take them out of the building.” Frank’s gave further information pointing to an inside government operation on the same radio program:

We had two secretaries who work down there who had noticed that, and these ladies survived it, and they was told that all the top-level officers, and the FBI, ATF, and all the DEA was transferred prior to the explosion, so we knew that the ATF was not, anyone in the building when this happened, and the FBI was told to get out of the building. (Ibid. p.166, 167)

The implications of this statement are obvious. Not only did the government have advanced warning and prior knowledge, but it appears that federal agencies housed within the Murrah Building and federal agents on location the day of the attacks may have had something to do with the bombing.

According to Oklahoma investigator J.D. Cash, there was a bomb scare at 10:30 a.m. the morning of the bombing. The bomb scare was caused by the discovery of a two by two foot box clearly marked “high explosives”. At best the ATF, which had offices in the building, is guilty of gross criminal negligence causing death or several of their agents are guilty of premeditation and intent in this crime against humanity. Cash claims to have on video four witnesses who claim to have seen the ATF clearing out their arsenal room two weeks after the explosion. Among the articles removed were an array of firearms, hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammunition, explosives, boxes marked explosives, TOW missiles, grenades, etc. That’s quite an arsenal. That’s a veritable Molotov cocktail of explosive materials conveniently planted and ready to be set off by the 3.500 pounds of pressure per square inch resulting from the impact pressure of the truck bomb. Investigator Cash pulls no punches in pointing to ATF culpability. Though his accusations fall short of accusing the ATF of premeditation and intent, his testimony is damning enough:

If you know this is a cantilevered building, it’s a perfect structure for a truck bomb to do the maximum amount of damage to, and if it did and the explosion, if it did bring down that facia area and rupture the ATF arsenal room – and since the ATF was keeping the repellant caps or percussion caps for C-4, it is reasonable to assume that they also were keeping C-4 there – if a case of C-4 fell out of that room during the initial blast, then demolition people…and you can check with anybody who is familiar with C-4, they will tell you that C-4 is extremely safe to handle, but you can set it off with 3,500 pounds of pressure per square inch. And so, if a case of C-4 came out of that room, or if C-4 was stored in another area of that building, in the southeast area, and if that facia came down from the explosion outside, which I think we all agree it did, then it builds up on top of…3,500 pounds is nothing when you look at the facia of the building…then that would explain that huge amount of destruction on the southeast side. So what we may have had is the government’s ineptitude, the ATF overlooking and not following procedure. They may have killed most of the people in that building that day, and certainly they’re not going to be the first ones to admit it. (Ibid, p.109)

Given the pattern of federal agencies staging war game exercises in all of these disasters, it does indeed appear likely that ATF armed explosives were deliberately left in their offices granting the state-sponsored terrorists operating within their ranks plausible deniability and non-accountability. Even if ATF officials were found to have left explosive devices that had failed to be properly disarmed on the building premises, standard whitewash procedure of any organization facing disciplinary and legal responsibility for culpability, would call for concealment and denial, in effect, a cover-up. And that is undeniably what is in effect with the Oklahoma bombing. It is a classic case of government agency cover-up at every level.

In a detailed analysis just released supporting the controlled demolition theory, Reynolds presents a compelling case. “First, no steel-framed skyscraper, even engulfed in flames hour after hour, had ever collapsed before. Suddenly, three stunning collapses occur within a few city blocks on the same day, two allegedly hit by aircraft, the third not," said Reynolds. "These extraordinary collapses after short-duration minor fires made it all the more important to preserve the evidence, mostly steel girders, to study what had happened.”

After considering both sides of the 9/11 debate and after thoroughly sifting through all the available material, Reynolds concludes the government story regarding all four plane crashes on 9/11 remains highly suspect. "In fact, the government has failed to produce significant wreckage from any of the four alleged airliners that fateful day. The familiar photo of the Flight 93 crash site in Pennsylvania shows no fuselage, engine or anything recognizable as a plane, just a smoking hole in the ground," said Reynolds. "Photographers reportedly were not allowed near the hole. Neither the FBI nor the National Transportation Safety Board have investigated or produced any report on the alleged airliner crashes."

(“Two More WTC Workers Claim Explosion In Lower Levels Of North Tower,” Greg Szymanski, www.arcticbeacon.com, posted at 7/13/2005 11:50:00 AM)

Despite the gag order imposed on firefighters and FAA officials in the wake of the 9-11 attacks, several witnesses have come forward to give their eyewitness accounts to foreign media enterprises immune to gag orders and media muzzling. Two credible sources, one of whom is William Rodriguez, recently declared a national hero for his rescue attempts on 9-11, have come forward with eyewitness testimony that a huge explosion ripped apart the lower levels of the north tower immediately prior to the alleged jetliner slamming into the upper floors. The two WTC workers reported hearing an underground blast, from which they suffered injuries, including severe burns to the face, arms, hands, and numerous abrasions after being trapped in a stalled basement elevator. Burn victim, Felipe David, employed by Aramark Co. and Salvatore Giambanco, a WTC office painter trapped in a basement elevator at the time, later testified to a Colombian television station in 2002 on the first anniversary of 9/11. Their comments were eventually aired in Colombia in Spanish on the Red Continental De Noticias (RNC) as part of an in depth 9/11 documentary after the foreign station spent a month in New York in 2002 shooting the project. Despite the great exposure received, their testimony still fails to stand up in court back home, either in the 9-11 Commission, which should be dubbed the 9-11 Omission, or in the mainstream media.

A copy of the original interview tapes with RCN reporter Claudia Gurisatti questioning the WTC workers was made available by WTC maintenance worker William Rodriguez in 2005, just before going public about the north tower basement explosions. Recently, Rodriguez said he heard a massive basement explosion seconds before the jetliner struck the upper floors when he, along with 14 other co-workers, were huddled in a sub-level 1 office. Besides the testimony of these workers, there are the taped statements of Jose Sanchez, another WTC maintenance worker, who said he heard an underground explosion at the same time the others reported having heard something, while working in a small sub-level 4 workshop.

While all of these men are frustrated by the media blackout on all testimony and evidence contradicting the government line, no one is more annoyed or put out than Rodriguez, who can see no justification for it beyond a high-level government cover up. “What really upsets me is that we have all these people coming forward with credible testimony about explosions and we have been completely ignored by the 9/11 Commission and the major media,” said Rodriguez about what he calls an obvious media and government blackout on any information contrary to the official story that only jet fuel brought down the towers, the theory predictably embraced by the 9/11 Commission. “They concluded jet fuel brought down the towers without even considering the testimony of WTC eyewitness workers like David, Giambanco and Sanchez. Why would they do that unless they are covering up something?” Once perplexed by the media blackout, Rodriguez is now convinced the 9-11 Commission, more aptly named the 9-11 Omission, along with the glaring mass media omissions and other important pieces of evidence and testimony, points to a government orchestrated whitewash and cover up. His outrage is palpable and unequivocal:

And, concerning the American press, they have locked their doors on all of us, never allowing our stories to surface or even trying to investigate why the 9/11 Commission didn’t bother to include out statements in the final report. Here we have a Colombian station in 2002 doing their work and three years later our story only has appeared in South America in Spanish. What does that tell you?

(“Two More WTC Workers Claim Explosion In Lower Levels Of North Tower,” posted on: 7/13/2005 11:50:00 AM – by Greg Szymansky)

After his testimony was stricken from the 9-11 Commission record, Rodriguez decided to take justice into his own hands. “Unless there is a cover-up, why didn’t they use my comments or even mention my name?” he asks. Rodriguez claims that, when the government pressured him to change his story or keep silent, he refused to play ball. He was subsequently blackballed and forced to live on the street at one point. Living under a bridge and seeing no way out, he planned to tie himself to a cross in the middle of Ground Zero to make his point. Then, through the help of a Methodist support group, he was able to make a fiery comeback. His troubles are far from over though. He recently returned from a 9-11 lecture in Chicago to find his apartment burglarized, the thieves taking his laptop, containing a lot of stored data, and other household items. Rodriguez has begun speaking out at speaking engagements in Hollywood and Chicago. “I will speak at every church and university in the country if that is what it takes to get at the truth. The government story is a lie, and I know it for a fact because I was there that morning,” he was quoted as saying. “Last Man Out of WTC Possibly Slated for Mainstream Film Documentary” by Greg Szymanski, Sept. 26, 2005, http://www.arcticbeacon.com)

In the taped interviews of 2002 on Colombian television, David and Giambanco, both trapped in different basement locations, recount heartrending stories of surviving what they thought was a massive underground explosion, not an airplane strike 90 floors above. Standing in front of a freight elevator on sub level 1 near the office where Rodriguez and 14 others were huddled together when the explosion erupted below, David said in the taped interview:

That day I was in the basement in sub-level 1 sometime after 8:30am. Everything happened so fast, everything moved so fast. The building started shaking after I heard the explosion below, dust was flying everywhere and all of a sudden it got real hot. I threw myself onto the floor, covered my face because I felt like I was burned. I sat there for a couple of seconds on the floor and felt like I was going to die, saying to myself ‘God, please give me strength.

(“Two More WTC Workers Claim Explosion In Lower Levels Of North Tower,” posted on: 7/13/2005 11:50:00 AM – by Greg Szymanski)

Despite severe burns to his face, arms, and hands, and with skin hanging from his body, David picked himself up, running for help to the office were Rodriguez and others were gathered. “When I went in, I told them it was an explosion,” said David. “When people looked at me with my skin hanging, they started crying but I heard others say ‘OK, good, good, you made it alive.’” (Ibid.)

While David, Rodriguez and others were in shock from the basement explosion, Giambanco was on the opposite side of sub level 1 by another elevator. In the taped interview, Giambanco told Gurisatti, the Colombian reporter:

We heard the explosion and the smoke all of a sudden came from all over. There was an incredible force of wind that also swept everything away. I remember hearing a scream of a woman, but I couldn’t see her. I had just gotten off the elevator and I was standing by it with another man but didn’t know his name. The doors of the elevator were still open and, I don’t know why we did, but we both jumped back in maybe because of the wind whipping everything around in the hallway. “Then, suddenly, the elevator doors closed in front of us and we started going down. It all of a sudden stopped and I could see through the cracks we were between B-2 and B-3. We were both screaming and afraid. I remember seeing through the slot of the elevator and seeing other people running and screaming. Then water started gushing in the elevator and I remember saying, ‘God, please help us.’ At that point, I was resigned to the fact I was going to die. (Ibid)

Divine intervention or human, Giambanco’s prayers were answered when he heard someone yelling from above, “How many people are down there?” The miracle above turned out to be Rodriguez who had returned after helping David to safety in order to help others after disobeying police orders to remain outside.

In the basement, Rodriguez managed to find a construction ladder, lowering it into the elevator after entering the darkened shaft and opening the top hatch on the elevator where Giambanco and the other unidentified man now were standing thigh-deep in water from the activated sprinkler system. “I don’t know he did it, but I felt him just pick me up and pull me out,” said Giambanco about Rodriguez’s rescue efforts. “I didn’t know who he was then, but I do now and he definitely saved my life. If it wasn’t for William Rodriguez, I wouldn’t be here today.” After Rodriguez brought him to safety, Giambanco remembers being rushed to a hospital where in his hospital room, he received news reports that both towers had collapsed. (Ibid)

Why has the government invoked so many gag orders in the case of the Oklahoma bombing, the Pentagon and World Trade Center attacks, and Hurricane Katrina? The argument repeatedly invoked that it is in the interests of national security simply doesn’t wash. How is national security upheld by gag orders that prevent the nation and its people from investigating crimes of national import, which is ultimately for their own protection? In another instance of gag orders being imposed with threats superadded is the case of a 9-11 rescue worker who was warned by FBI agents to “keep his mouth shut” about one of the black boxes a fellow firefighter recovered from the debris of the collapsed towers. Honorary firefighter Mike Bellone says he was approached by FBI agents shortly after he and his partner, Nicholas DeMasi, found three of the four black boxes in the WTC rubble. Their claim was recorded as early as 2003 in a book called Behind the Scenes: Ground Zero. “They confronted me and told me not to say anything,” Bellone claimed. Bellone said 9-11 Commission members never contacted him or DeMasi and never subpoenaed them to appear before the body, even though the previously referred to book was published long before the hearings began. This revelation contradicts the official story that the black boxes were never recovered from the wreckage. National Transportation Safety Board officials have stated on record that the black boxes should have withstood the conditions of the WTC disaster. “It’s extremely rare that we don’t get the recorders back,” said NTSB spokesperson Ted Lopatkiewicz. “I can’t remember another case (where) we did not recover the recorders.” (“Black Box Cover Up: Rescue workers silences after exposing 9-11 whitewash” Greg Szymanski, www.americanfreepress.net/html/black_box.html) The fact that the crime scene had been tampered with by a federal agency with the tower rubble being carted off before a proper investigation could take place would make it rather difficult to recover the black boxes. The fact that the government has been able to get away with breaking the law in this fashion is amazing enough, but then the gag orders imposed on the media under the pretext of safeguarding national security has been a justification for nearly every violation in the book in the wake of 9-11.

The authors of this book are close colleagues of Peter Kawaja, radio show host and producer of Tropic Wave Radio. Before working in radio, Mr. Kawaja was given high tech security installation jobs for the U.S. government and other prestigious contracts. Mr. Kawaja has stated on several of his radio programs that the official story on 9-11 doesn’t add up. In the case of the flight recorders for American 11 and United 175, the data recorders should have survived impact, but even if they didn’t, the technology is now available to send the data by signal to a data storage facility offsite, according to Mr. Kawaja. The same goes for the WTC, whose video data recorders would not have to be recovered since the data would be sent offsite anyway by fiber optic feed lines that would see the data reached a data storage facility offsite.

The case for controlled demolition bringing down the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center is gathering momentum. Theologian and author David Ray Griffin recently spoke before packed houses in New York on October 15th and 16th about how recently revealed evidence makes it an open and shut case for controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC-7. “It is already possible to know, beyond a reasonable doubt, one very important thing: the destruction of the World trade Center was an inside job, orchestrated by terrorists within our own government.” No statement by any public official could be more powerful than that. His unbridled confidence in making such an allegation suggests that the evidence is now readily available to support his claim. It is also clear that a man of his reputation and public standing would hardly be likely to risk his good fortune on dubious claims and meager evidence.

Author of two books on 9-11, the theologian gave a presentation titled, “The Destruction of the Trade Towers: A Christian Theologian Speaks Out.” Dr. Griffin included in his presentation excerpts from the firemen’s tapes, which were only recently released under pressure from the victim’s families who were represented in a protracted court battle by attorney Normal Siegal as reported in the New York Times. These witnesses gave lengthy testimony of explosions going off in the buildings. A 12-minute film was shown to the audience, who saw the irrefutable evidence for controlled demolition for themselves.

Dr. Griffin gave ten reasons for why the buildings did not fall due to being struck by planes of the resulting fires associated with the impact of those planes. He argued that the buildings fell suddenly straight into their own foundation at freefall speed, meeting no resistance as they fell, a phenomenon which can only be explained by the removal of core support by means of explosive detonations within the towers. He reminded the audience that the towers were built to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 and 160 mile an hour winds. The plane crash and ensuing fires were nothing the towers weren’t built to withstand. In addition, the massive core columns were severed into almost perfectly uniform 30-foot sections, just the right size for the Controlled Demolition company’s 30-foot trucks to cart away before a crime scene investigation could be launched.

Even more telling is the fact that there was a volcanic-like dust cloud which formed as a result of the concrete being pulverized, and no explanation besides that of controlled explosives demolition can account for the buildings’ concrete being reduced to fine dust. The debris was ejected horizontally hundreds of feet in fan-shaped plumes in all directions, with “squibs” following the path of the explosives downward. These are the facts have been shunned by mainstream news media, yet these characteristics of controlled demolition were being discussed by firefighters and news people the morning of 9-11. How is it that such important testimony could have been withheld from the American people and the citizens of the world by the mainstream news media for so long? The answer is that gag order need not even be imposed. There is no need; the corporate news media will muzzle its own. Not only are the corporate news media in bed with the power brokers in Washington, they rely on advertising revenue that requires that they feed from the same cattle trough, whose fodder is provided by the political machine in Washington. The multiple witness accounts of controlled demolition were kept sealed for four years by the city of New York until a lawsuit launched the victim’s families pried open the jaws of concealment and obstruction of justice.

In the wake of the September 11 attacks, President Bush urged people not to tolerate the “outrageous conspiracy theories, but as Dr. Griffin points out there was no conspiracy theory more outrageous than the U.S. government’s, “because it is violently contradicted by numerous facts, including some basic laws of physics.” The government’s line that the impact of the planes coupled with the jet fuel burning at such high temperatures heated and weakened the steal support columns initiating the towers’ collapse. This is a conspiracy theory in its own right and not a terribly convincing one, and one that would never stand up to the scrutiny of a proper scientific review, a review that was never permitted because the hard evidence was removed from the crime scene. (Kevin Barrett, “Case For WTC Tower Demolition Sealed By Griffin: Theologian Says Controlled Demolition is Now a Fact, Not a Theory,” Jeff Rense, http://www.rense.com/general68/caseforWTCtower.htm)

Recently, Rene Welch, a scientist involved with the government’s brain development program went public in May 2005with allegations that the U.S. government was not only actively involved in the planning of 9-11, but had carefully laid plans for initiating World War III and global population reduction. She claimed she had uncovered this clandestine initiative called “Global Cleanse 2000” when working on the brain development program back in 1987. During this period, she claims she had two encounters with Saudi royals, including two bin Laden brothers, who maintained the U.S. government was actively participating in pre-arranging a 9-11-type scenario. The meetings exceeded eight hours in length and took place in Sedona and Pleasant Valley, Arizona. The plans revealed how the U.S. government was planning an attack on the World Trade Center that would kick off a war in the Middle East. Her story has been corroborated by Ronald Logsdon, a scientist who was working on a NASA program with Welch along with Naomi Miles, both of whom were present at the meetings.

Welch claims that when she was working for NASA as a scientist on brain development research in Phoenix, she obtained a secret computer code that granted her access to a secret government-funded study titled “Global Cleanse 2000” outlining global war and population reduction strategies. When all of this began nearly 20 years ago, FBI and CIA operatives promised that they would leave her alone if she “Shut up and lay low”. She has now made public a 200-page document detailing the staging of 9-11, Global Cleanse 2000 and innumerable FBI and CIA civil rights violations. “I’m naming names and want justice,” Welch is quoted as saying. Skeptics will wonder why it has taken Welch so long to come forward. In reply and defense, it is clear she has suffered repeated harassment, beatings and even drugging campaigns by intelligence operatives. In addition, her past attempts to alert the government, sending copies to the Clinton White House, including Hilary Clinton, and Taos New Mexico former district attorney John Paternoster, who Welch approached in 1995 about government death threats. NASA scientist Logsdon even elaborates at some length about the meeting that took place way back in 1987:

Two of the bin Laden brothers came some 90 miles from Phoenix, Arizona, and stopped at our doorstep unannounced. Their bodyguards set up a surveillance parameter around our property and others came into our house, taped up the windows and set up a film projector. The people in this motorcade seemed very scared, and presented this as a matter of life and death.

These men told us to be very cautious and to assume that we were under surveillance by our government. For several hours they showed us films of meetings of key Arabs and U.S. government officials discussing the oil issues. The bottom line was that if the Arabs did not do it their way, the U.S. would simply take their oil by force. They also explained that they have been manipulated into setting up bank accounts where oil profits were siphoned off and were no longer under their control.

They then explained why the World Trade Centers were the ideal target for this purpose. The two bin Ladens showed us this film because they made it very clear they did not want to be involved with any U.S. plot to manipulate the Arab governments or start a war.

(“Bin Laden Brothers Tip-Off Two NASA Research Scientists in 1987 about U.S. Government Plans to Cause 9/11; Now Third person Comes forward to Verify Scientists’ incredible Story” by Greg Szymanski, July 27, 2005, www.rense.com)

However, the war game exercises were not confined to the World Trade Center. That would be impossible. The war game exercises would have to be universal and broad enough in scope that they would create confusion and thwart all efforts normal emergency response protocols in the state-sponsored, government-insiders free-for-all. The war game drill was not confined to the World Trade Center twin towers. There is no way they could have been. The Tripod II war game exercise only granted cover to FEMA agents planting the incendiary devices. This would by no means be sufficient to pull off the operation, precisely because further plausible deniability was required for the state sponsored terrorists behind the controlled demolition of the twin towers to get off scot-free. The impression had to be created that airliners hijacked by Middle Eastern terrorists were the true cause of the World Trade Center collapse, not the explosives that had been planted all the way up and down the towers in advance. However, the perpetrators needed to guarantee that the passenger airliners were there on time and on target. Nothing could be left to chance. A war game drill had to be carried out on the ground and in the air simultaneously, ensuring that the entire event would be coordinated perfectly with all operatives comfortably in position, prepared and ready, without the least cause for panic, uncertainty, unpreparedness, or a need to race against the clock. The hijacked airlines employed as tactical missiles would be there and the controlled demolition of the twin towers would be perfectly timed with the impact of the two birds into the Twin Towers, granting the perpetrators of the controlled demolition plausible deniability, an alibi and an out.

On 9-11, war game exercises were being held on the ground and in the air simultaneously. The war game exercise in the air would involve at least four large-scale agencies, including NORAD, the FAA, the Canadian Air Force, and the National Reconnaissance Office. Some of the drills involved hijackings of airliners. The denials of prior knowledge by members of the Bush administration and top generals of the U.S. military like Gen. Richard B. Myers are clear perjury and blatant lies because they would have had to know about these war game drills nicknamed operation “Top Off” because they involve top officials in the country. “Top off” means ‘top officials’, in this case, the top officials in the United States and Canada, since it was a joint exercise. In some cases, the hijackings were real and in some cases, according to Michael C. Ruppert, not real, but staged, with blips deliberately programmed to appear on FAA and military radar screens, which were present during the first attacks and succeeded in pulling significant fighter resources away from the northeast U.S. on September 11. Some of these exercises involved “live-fly” drills, where actual aircraft were simulating the behavior of hijacked airliners simultaneously with the real-time events. (Michael C. Ruppert, Crossing the Rubicon, 336) With a war game drill occurring at the same time as the actual event, it is easy to imagine why air traffic controllers, the FAA, and NORAD command, not to speak of Air Force generals and top military brass might become confused. The words of Sr. Airman Stacia Rountree could not be more chilling in this context: “We had three aircraft down and the possibility of others hijacked. We had to think outside the box…Before the day ended, 21 aircraft across the US had been handled as ‘tracks of interest’.” (Crossing the Rubicon, 348)

The name of the war game exercise involving NORAD, the FAA, the Canadian Air Force, and the National Reconnaissance Office was called Vigilant Guardian. Details of the Vigilant Guardian war game exercise were classified and unavailable. These exercises were said to be based on cold war-era type threats and were said to be held once a year. However, post-9-11 statements by NORAD indicated that the Vigilant Guardian exercise held on September 11 was not of traditional kind. This was not a war game exercise aimed at a Russian threat, and why would it be with no perceived threat coming from that arena since the end of the cold war? Operation Vigilant Guardian had a direct impact on the Northeast Air Defense Sector, where all four hijackings occurred. Aviation Week even reported that, “Senior officials involved in Vigilant Guardian were manning NORAD command centers throughout the US and Canada, available to make immediate decisions.” This war game exercise was supposed to facilitate a quick response in the event of a terrorist or otherwise aggressive attack. (Ibid. 337) What the war game exercise actually did was not only slowdown the proper tactical response to the terrorist attack on September 11, but cripple it altogether. The naïve will call this ironic and the arrogant fools in academia might even twitter with laughter over it. But this is not some tragic accident, a case of bad timing, an inconvenient coincidence or anything of the kind. This is premeditated calculated evil of the most malevolent kind. The war game exercise was deliberately timed not only to sabotage a real-time military response, but to grant the perpetrators plausible deniability by coordinating a war game exercise at the same time as an actual attack. The war game exercise was conducted ostensibly for the good of the nation, but was actually a treasonous disruption and the most insidious kind of decoy operation.

NORAD has also admitted that it ran two mock drills on September 11, involving various radar and command centers in the US and Canada that included air force bases in New York, Florida, Washington, and Alaska. Investigators in the 9-11 commission were at one time looking into whether NORAD’s attention was unduly misdirected toward the North Pole by the drill, when the hijackings came from an entirely different quarter. (Ibid. 338)

Another Operation Top Off-type exercise was being held up in Canada, on September 11 called Operation Northern Vigilance. It involved the deployment of fighter jets north to Alaska and northern Canada in preparation for a Russian event. The Toronto Star even reported that the operation had to be immediately called off during the September 11 attacks, while “injects” were purged from the screens. (Ibid. 339) The fact that so-called “injects” or false radar blips were deliberately programmed to appear on radar screens as part of the war game exercise is diabolically convenient for the state-sponsored terrorists. Whose screens did these blips appear on? How much did they throw normal Air Force response into chaos on both sides of the border?

While all these war game exercises are being staged on 9-11, another exercise involving the National Reconnaissance Office is being played out. The National Reconnaissance Office is a joint CIA and a division of the U.S. Air Force operating US spy satellites. NRO was also running a war game exercise on 9-11. This operation involved a scenario in which a plane would crash into the headquarters of the NRO in the Washington D.C. suburb of Chantilly, Virginia, just outside Dulles International airport, where flight 77 first spread its wings. On the occasion of 9-11, the CIA was in charge of the NRO drill. (Ibid. 340-341) Presumably, the decoy war game drill would have had attention diverted to a war game scenario so that the satellite hawks would not be tending to the real-time situation over America’s skies.

According to 9/11 Commission staff report Flight 77 began deviating from its flight path at 8:54 and then completely disappeared at 8:56. The staff report describes the activity surrounding Flight 77 in some detail:

Shortly after 9:00, Indianapolis Center started notifying other agencies that American 77 was missing and had possibly crashed…At 9:09, they reported the loss of contact to the FAA regional center, which passed this information to FAA headquarters at 9:24…Radar reconstructions performed after 9/11 reveal that FAA radar equipment tracked the flight from the moment its transponder was turned off at 8:56 a.m. But for 8 minutes and 13 seconds, between 8:56 a.m. and 9:05 a.m., this primary radar information on American 77 was not displayed to controllers at Indianapolis Center. The reasons are technical, arising from the way the software processed radar information, as well as from poor primary radar coverage where American 77 was flying.

In sum, Indianapolis Center never saw flight 77 turn around…American 77 traveled undetected for 36 minutes on a course heading due east for Washington, D.C.

(9/11 Commission staff report quoted in “Crossing the Rubicon,” p.400)

This is what Benedict Sliney, the FAA’s National Operations Manager on 9/11 had to say about the radar and transponder issues of Flight 77: “There are radars that would have seen the target regardless. Would they have known what to be looking for? I do not know.” (Ibid, p.401)

According to the 9/11 Commission staff report, orders were given from the Mission Crew Commander at NEADS (North East Air Defense System) at 9:23. “Okay…scramble Langley. Head them towards the Washington area.” The scramble order was given to fighter hawks at Langley Air Force base – a CIA-run Air Force base – in Virginia. Instead of heading north toward the pentagon, however, the fighter pilots headed east in conformity with a ‘generic” scramble order. This sent them out over the ocean, because the lead pilot and local FAA controller assumed that the flight plan instruction to go east was the newer guidance that superseded the original scramble order. It is claimed that the Langley pilots were never briefed about why they were being scrambled. This is presumably because the pilots had been briefed on the cold war-style war game exercise involving a mock attack from the Russians. The lead pilot gave his own telling account on the confusion, “I reverted to the Russian threat…I’m thinking cruise missile threat from the sea. You know, you look down and see the Pentagon burning and I though the bastards snuck one by us.” The Langley pilots responded according to a Russian threat presumed to have come from somewhere in the Atlantic. Because the pilots were never briefed or made aware that the threat was coming from hijacked airliners, they failed to respond to an internal attack. They obviously perceived the attack to be a cold war-style Russian attack coming from outside. This explains General Myers comment alluded to in a previous chapter, “We’re pretty good when the threat’s coming from outside. We’re not so good if the threat is coming from inside.” Unbelievably, the fighter jocks appear not to have been told that the attack involving hijacked passenger airliners was coming from inside, this despite two World Trade Towers and the Pentagon in flames. (Ibid, p.401)

Scramble orders were given for fighter jets from Otis Air Force base in response to the hijacking of Flight 11 at 8:46. Because the plane’s transponder signal had disappeared, NEADS spent the next few minutes searching their radar for the target. The Otis jets were not airborne until 8:53, well after Flight 11 hit the World Trade Center. Astonishingly, NEADS claims it did not know where to send the jetfighters, so they were sent out off the coast Long Island. This allowed Flight 175 to crash into the second World Trade Tower. As with the Langley fighter pilots, the Otis Air Force base pilots were flying blind. They had no idea where they were going or what they were supposed to intercept. (Ibid, 401)

The testimony of the Langley lead pilot confirms that the Pentagon had already been attacked as he flew overhead. How could he not be informed about the nature of the attack? There can only be two explanations, incompetence and gross criminal negligence or premeditated high treason and war crimes. It has to be one or the other. The fact that General Myers should be promoted three days later to the second highest military command position in the country as head of the Joint Chiefs speaks volumes. The general is obviously not being promoted as a reward for competence and a job well done where the 9/11 emergency response is concerned, which suggests that he is receiving his reward for an operation of another kind involving the successful orchestration of a Air Force stand down non-response on 9/11 with premeditated and criminal intent.

As might be expected, the details of the war game drills were classified. Details of Operation Top Off-type drills like Vigilant Guardian, involving top officials, were only available to top officials, the very individuals who would be coordinating and carrying out those drills. Who these officials were would remain as classified as the operations themselves, and for very good reason. If not the actual perpetrators of the state-sponsored terrorist attacks, the top officials would have a direct hotline to those who were. As in any special ops intelligence operation, the chain of command would delegate operations in such a manner that those in charge of the operation at the top would remain anonymous, and would remain utterly immune to scrutiny, investigation, and accountability. They would remain behind a screen like any crime boss and would not show their face, sign a paper, or speak to anyone directly involved in the operation. How do we know the pre-9/11 war game drills are top secret? Because NORAD tells us so:

The planning, execution and lessons learned aspects of NORAD exercises were classified. In fact, during the planning stages only so-called trusted agents, those directly involved in the planning and execution, knew details of exercises. For operational security reasons, therefore, NORAD cannot discuss details or results of its pre 9/11 hijack exercises…

(E-mail from NORAD spokesperson Major Nancy Quon to Michael C. Ruppert dated April 20, 2004, Crossing the Rubicon)

The classification of the war game exercises meant that only a few would be in on the planning and implementation. In addition, no one involved in the top secret drills would be allowed to speak about any details related to the operations. Top officials at the FAA and the Air Force would be under a strict protocol of secrecy. This would insulate the perpetrators at the top and prevent any compromising leaks from coming out that might either jeopardize the status of the drill, or lead to future investigations or possible indictments.

The 9/11 Commission was a whitewash by almost anyone’s standards. It was a commission of omission, concealment, evasion, diversion, and fraudulence. When asked who was responsible for conducting the war game exercises on September 11, for instance, Gen. Ralph E. Eberhart, the man in charge of NORAD on the morning in question, replied, “No comment,” as he was wont to do. The man in charge held a very high office in the country indeed. We will come to who that man was later. Later, 9/11 commissioner, Roemer, asked Eberhart a very pointed and direct question that cut to the heart of the matter:

Roemer: My question is, you were postured for an exercise against the former Soviet Union. Did that help or hurt? Did that help in terms of were more people prepared? Did you have more people ready? Were more fighters fueled with more fuel? Or did this hurt in terms of people thinking, “There’s no possibility that this is real world; we’re engaged in an exercise,” and delay things?

Eberhart: Sir, my belief is that it helped because of the manning, because of the focus, because the crews – they have to be airborne in 15 minutes, and that morning, because of the exercise, they were airborne in 6 or 8 minutes. And so I believed that focus helped. (Quoted in “Over the Rubicon,” p.395)

While the absurdity of this answer could not possibly be overlooked by anyone in the room, it was overlooked from the standpoint of Roemer’s line of questioning. A good commissioner – able, competent, and honest – would have gone for the jugular at this point, would have gone in for the k